[Thread Prev][Thread Next][Thread Index]
Thanks everyone! (Re: Newsline: religious warfare breaks out in PilotManager mail-list)
- To: Neal Pollack <nealpo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Thanks everyone! (Re: Newsline: religious warfare breaks out in PilotManager mail-list)
- From: Platibus <platibus@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 17:30:24 -0500
- Cc: seth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kedwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pilotmgr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Organization: Platibus Software Factories, Inc.
- References: <199801152207.OAA19146@utopia.West.Sun.COM>
- Sender: owner-pilotmgr
I wasn't trying to start a war, I was asking a question. Thanks to all the
participants in the discussion more questions have been raised and some have been
clarified. I hope that way we're all winners.
Maybe this is a good point to take the discussion offline and conserve bandwidth
in the list (I guess I've used up enough for today).
Thanks,
Thomas
Neal Pollack wrote:
> Oh My GOD! ...
>
> Not the religious wars again.
> Get a clue people. There will NOT be a winner, this type
> of argument NEVER is won. The reason there are different languages
> is because diff things appeal to diff people.
>
> Diff people like diff cars, stereos, speakers, house colors,
> clothing, food, mates, jobs.
>
> Person A trying to convince person B that his/her way is the
> only right way is a fool game. Give it up.
>
> After 395482742 million pages of arguments in the press,
> guess what, there is still more than one OS. Always will be.
> Same with languages.
>
> Just choose what you like and move on.
> Don't argue for the next 3 weeks on how the artist
> should hold which brand paint brush. Get it?
>
> P.S. I like perl *and* Java also.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neal
>
> > From: Keith Edwards <kedwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > To: "Seth M. Landsman" <seth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: pilotmgr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: larger issue (Re: Linux install misses Tk)
> > Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 12:15:54 PST
> >
> > Seth M. Landsman writes:
> > > *WHY* would writing java conduits be easier? *WHAT* would make
> > > them easier? Perl is an excellent and complete language. Java is an
> > > excellent (and incomplete, compared to perl :)) language (the testbed for
> > > my dissertation is written in java). However, we're not using graphics.
> > > We're not using low level sockets. We are doing non-native database
> > > processing and dealing with lots of text and string processing. This is
> > > *NOT* something java handles natively.
> >
> > *WHY* are you assuming that because some string functions are
> > implemented in Java rather than C that this is bad? *WHAT* could
> > possibly matter about how the text processing is implemented? *WHAT*
> > is the matter with simply plugging in a reasonable regular
> > expression matcher and a JIT to speed things along?
> >
> > Despite the fact that I'd love a PilotManager-like thingy written in
> > Java, I'm actually pretty happy with the current system. It works on
> > my platform (Solaris), and works well. I don't think the expense in
> > time required to port to Java is *necessarily* worth giving up other
> > things (more conduits, or short-term stability, for example). I
> > believe that these pragmatic issues are valid arguments against
> > reimplementing in Java.
> >
> > It's just that I don't happen to believe your claim that because Java
> > doesn't "natively" implement text processing (whatever that means to
> > you) that it's a shut and dried case.
> >
> > -keith
> >
> >
> > ----
> > keith edwards
> > xerox palo alto research center
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ***********************************************************
> > * This is a public mailing list! *
> > * Please do not publish Sun proprietary information here! *
> > * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *
> > * http://www.moshpit.org/pilotmgr *
> > ***********************************************************
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Neal S. Pollack 310-348-6129 Extension 46129
> Solaris Certification Group, Sunsoft, Los Angeles, California
> http://access1.sun.com/certify EMAIL: Neal.Pollack@xxxxxxx
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ***********************************************************
> * This is a public mailing list! *
> * Please do not publish Sun proprietary information here! *
> * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *
> * http://www.moshpit.org/pilotmgr *
> ***********************************************************
begin: vcard
fn: Thomas Werthmann-Auzinger
n: Werthmann-Auzinger;Thomas
org: Platibus Software Factories, Inc.
adr: P.O. Box 3719;;;Princeton;NJ;08543-3719;U.S.A.
email;internet: platibus@xxxxxxxxxxxx
title: President
tel;work: (609) 716 8486
note;quoted-printable:World Class Solutions With Java For Your Business:=0D=0A=
http://www.platibus.com ******=0D=0A=
Iris - a Java Engine for Rational Rose Model Files:=0D=0A=
http://www.platibus.com/iris
x-mozilla-cpt: ;0
x-mozilla-html: FALSE
version: 2.1
end: vcard