[Thread Prev][Thread Next][Thread Index]
Re: Y2K
- To: Alan.Harder@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Gary.Foster@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Y2K
- From: Rob Anderson <robert.anderson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 13:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: dyep@xxxxxxx, pilotmgr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: Rob Anderson <robert.anderson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:38:45 -0700
> From: Gary.Foster@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Gary D. Foster)
>
> >>>>> "AH" == Alan Harder <Alan.Harder@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> AH> it is y2k unknown.. I have not tested it and probably won't
> AH> have time to do so.. anyone want to give it a whirl? Most
> AH> things store dates/times in ticks so I don't anticipate any
> AH> big problems.
>
> v.106 is most definitely _not_ y2k compliant, it wraps repeating dates
> that extend past 2000 to 1970.
Are you sure this is not your calendar tool that you're syncing to doing
this? For example, I used to have repeating "forever" ToDos in my old
OpenWindows CM. When I was moved to CDE CM, those repeating ToDos got
a start time *after* the endtime. Since CDE dtcm doesn't understand
ToDos with a time duration, it set the end time to "Wed Dec 31 16:00 1969"!!
the SyncCM conduit throws out these appointments as "unsupported".
There are Y2K patches at least for OpenWindows 3.5.1 (`showrev -w`).
rob a.